tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post3301398769593804485..comments2024-01-22T09:45:29.790+01:00Comments on Racing Rules of Sailing - Look to Windward: KIEL 2011 International Part; Day 8, 9 & EndJoshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10346870418220762709noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-74510417552253324182011-06-30T12:00:19.378+02:002011-06-30T12:00:19.378+02:00@Anonymous (5)
My sentiment exactly. The form shou...@Anonymous (5)<br />My sentiment exactly. The form should be changed to be able to have this possibility.<br />@John<br />I agree with you about the ROW not knowing about the penalty. Usually he has something else on his mind then to look for turns.<br />As a PC I'm not inclined to allow protest to be withdrawn involving damage.Joshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10346870418220762709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-67113826859622338972011-06-29T16:57:06.963+02:002011-06-29T16:57:06.963+02:00Jos, for the second question, the facts will deter...Jos, for the second question, the facts will determine dismissed or upheld. The PC may find differently that the skippers assumed. However the probable result that you are asking for is that the protest is upheld but no further penalty is assigned due to the on-course exoneration..<br /><br />I think it is reasonable for the protest to be filed as the ROW may not know that the GW boat took a penalty for the incident.<br /><br />Another possible and appropriate outcome is that at the hearing, and with the confirmation that the penalty was taken, the ROW may decide to ask to withdraw the protest.<br /><br />Johnball_hilaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13347580301029989280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-40872263730060499912011-06-29T15:50:17.066+02:002011-06-29T15:50:17.066+02:00Somehow it feels wrong to conclude that a rule was...Somehow it feels wrong to conclude that a rule was broken but then decide that the protest is dismissed! Maybe the decision section of the protest form needs to be reworded slightly?<br /><br />Personally I would write my decision thus: "Boat X penalized as follows: no further penalty applicable". In my conclusion I would write which Rule was broken but also that Boat X complied with Rule 44.1(a).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-2124318856358743002011-06-29T11:35:07.145+02:002011-06-29T11:35:07.145+02:00So it all comes down to damage. It wasn't ser...So it all comes down to damage. It wasn't serious damage. I would like to go see what the damage is and probably dismiss the protest because the offender did his turns. If the right of way claims serious damage then the give way boat should have retired.Vicky Gilmournoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-54068965354769552022011-06-29T11:27:06.348+02:002011-06-29T11:27:06.348+02:00@ball_hilary
My question is do you conclude that t...@ball_hilary<br />My question is do you conclude that the protest is dismissed or upheld?<br />The PC is not working for the Insurance but it is an argument in favour of the second answer.Joshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10346870418220762709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-54295607166757624252011-06-28T15:21:10.135+02:002011-06-28T15:21:10.135+02:00Collision with damage. Insurance Co will want writ...Collision with damage. Insurance Co will want written decision. Option 2<br /><br />Thanks for the work you do, and for the blogDavid Snoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9170261917486213112.post-13037060027912518562011-06-28T01:19:07.403+02:002011-06-28T01:19:07.403+02:00R63.1 says that you have to hear the protest unles...R63.1 says that you have to hear the protest unless it is withdrawn. There is nothing wrong with a finding that a penalty has been taken under R 44 and no further penalty assigned. <br /><br />Johnball_hilaryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13347580301029989280noreply@blogger.com