Friday 13 November 2009

Committee-meetings in Busan | part 2

News about the submissions. One of the committee members send me an update about how the RO and RR-committee voted. They still have to be approved by the council. For the list of submissions go to this post: Committee-meetings in Busan 

Below is his message, thanks Jon!

Jos,
I was reading your blog today and thought you might be interested (for your readers) to know the some of the recommendations made by Committees at ISAF Conference. They are only recommendations to Council, which can still decide otherwise. These come from the recommendation papers produced by each Committee following their meetings which are public documents.



Events Committee (I didn't see their paper but heard about this)


Voted to abolish redress in the medal race apart from giving help.


Race Officials Committee


010-09 was withdrawn
All the tracking submissions were recommended for rejection or deferral
Voted to abolish redress in the medal race apart from giving outside help
Identified the need to develop documents for education on conflicts of interest and a general code of conduct for ISAF Race Officials. ROC will host an ISAF Race Officials Conference to develop and deliver such documents.
Recommended that a rule 42 web library be developed and implemented
Recommended that measurers and equipment inspectors at high level events by appointed/approved by ISAF
Recommended increase in seminar and clinics in 2010


Racing Rules Committee


146-08 - Approve with amendment to the wording
147-08 - Defer
151-08 - Reject
004-09 - Approve with amendment
011-09 - Approve - the Executive has withdrawn all of the proposal except clause 20.6.5 on bibs
012-09 - Approve with amendment
013-09 - Reject
015-09 - Withdrawn
019-09 to 026-09 - Approve


131-09 - Withdrawn by US SAILING
132-09 - Approve and approved by ISAF RRC for urgent implementation on 1 Jan 2010
133-09 - Reject
134-09 - Reject - RRC commented "This issue needs clarification but this submission is not the right answer as it introduces further uncertainties"
135-09 - Reject
136-09 - Reject
137-09 - Reject
138-09 - Reject
139-09 - Approve with amendment
140-09 - Approve
141-09 - Reject
142-09 - Reject
143-09 - Reject
144-09 - Approve with amendment
145-09 - Reject
146-09 - Defer - RRC comments "Agree the principle. Requires further discussion between RRC and ROC"
147-09 - Approve
148-09 - Approve and approved by ISAF RRC for urgent implementation on 1 Jan 2010
150-09 - Approve
151-09 - Reject
152-09 - Approve with amendment
153-09 - Approve and approved by ISAF RRC for urgent implementation on 1 Jan 2010
154-09- Approve with amendment
155-09 - Approve with amendment
156-09 - Reject
157-09 - Reject
158-09 - Reject
159-09 - Approve
160-09 - Reject
161-09 - Approve with amendment
162-09 - Reject
163-09 - Approve and approved by ISAF RRC for urgent implementation on 1 Jan 2010
164-09 - Approve with amendment to delete the words "protest committee" on second last line
165-09 - Defer
166-09 - Reject
167-09 - Defer
168-09 - Approve with amendments
169-09 - Reject
170-09 - Reject - RRC comments "Case 112 is a correct interpretation of the current rules"
171-09 - Approve with amendment


Then of the Calls - all were recommended for approval except:
177-09 - Defer - RRC comments "Agree the principle but diagrams and text need editing"
171-09, 178-09, 182-09, 184-09 and 188-09 - Approve with amendments


Hope that is of interest to your readers.
Best wishes,
Jon


I will do a couple of blogpost on the approved submissions with the recommendation of implementation on 1 Jan 2010 in coming weeks. Let's wait and see if the Council gives the green light, before I start giving you my input how this will change the rules.



0 comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...