From the Golden Gate Yacht club website; www.ggyc.com
Statement by Tom Ehman, GGYC Spokesperson:
Valencia (January 19, 2010) – The America’s Cup defender, Société Nautique de Genève, issued today a revised Notice of Race and Sailing Instructions for the 33rd America’s Cup Match set to begin on February 8th in the waters off Valencia, Spain.
Both documents are riddled with errors, and continue SNG’s practice of interpreting rules – or creating new ones – solely to favor Alinghi and harm the chances of the Challenger.
The Notice of Race and Sailing Instructions are heavily biased in favor of the Defender and its yacht despite input from GGYC and ISAF, the sport’s world governing body, during last week’s meeting in Singapore and a meeting in late December in Sydney. Therefore, today GGYC has made an application for redress to the International Jury, asking that the Jury be convened as soon as possible to negate or revise the biased provisions before the Match.
Specifically, SNG has:
- Effectively re-inserted Racing Rule 53 (“Skin Friction”) after obtaining a New York Supreme Court ruling to delete it.
- Set the starting time for the races despite the Deed of Gift’s requirement that this be agreed by mutual consent.
- Set wind and wave limits to favor its own yacht.
- Changed the latest draft of the Notice of Race to ban certain wind detection equipment now being used by BOR that, previously, was permitted under all earlier drafts of the NOR.
- Re-arranged the hierarchy of the applicable rules so that SNG’s Notice of Race and Sailing Instructions would, in the case of conflict, overrule the Racing Rules; this is highly irregular and contrary to normal practice in yacht racing.
We now look to the International Jury to reinstate the correct and proper rules and procedures.
Rule 61.1: A request for redress ... shall be based on a claim or possibility that a boat's score in a race or series has, through no fault of her own, been made significantly worse by
(a) an improper action or omission of the ... organizing authority....
Past tense: "been made"
Shouldn't there be a race, to have a result, before a score can been made significantly worse?
I can understand one party wanting to fix issues in the NOR or SI, it perceives as bias. Normally if you think the conditions in the NOR are not fair, you just don't enter in the race. But in the AC this is very difficult, as one party is also the OA and gets to write all the race documents.
But a request for redress is perhaps not appropriate in this regard. What is, I don't know.
Do you have any ideas?